http://www.rockfax.com/databases/results_area.html?id=1032 World Rock Climbing Information. daily 2 2012-09-23T16:51+00:00 2012-09-23T16:51+00:00 Copyright (c) 2013 ROCKFAX Ltd Rockfax (mailto:info@rockfax.com) http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24839 allmag 2012-09-23T16:51+00:00 I go with Franco @ HS 5b - hard move(s) all low down. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24841 allmag 2012-09-23T16:48+00:00 Climbed this in 1973 - had very little gear but there aren't many placements anyhow. Quite a bold feel to it especially stepping round onto the final slab, which as wet and a westerly gale was... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24871 Steve Ramsden 2012-01-11T21:55+00:00 I can't delete them but I take back most of the above comments! I did a climb based around the upper arete in april '10. I started up Satchmo as described but continued heading up and right from the... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24893 Simon Caldwell 2010-06-23T11:35+00:00 Needs a fluttery symbol, there's even less protection than on the normal route - possibly (M)VS 4b. Some nice climbing, though a bit of an eliminate - it's hard to stick to the left hand crack when... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24821 Ben 2010-05-31T10:18+00:00 The gear is sparse - a bad thread. You may find yourself soloing. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24895 David Warburton 2010-05-22T09:45+00:00 J. Redhead avoided it, because it was filthy. They cleaned it up and did it next visit, i believe. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24895 Dan Arkle 2010-05-16T23:01+00:00 Correctly described as bold, at least initially, I thought the last move is clearly 5c - J Redhead avoided it! http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24835 GuyVG 2009-10-02T12:28+00:00 had to piano play my fingers into the eye, felt like hard 5c to me at 5'7". gear in break takes some thinking but i had confidence in my set up. 5b move guarding the main crux is no pushover. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24867 Richard Coulson 2009-09-21T16:38+00:00 had a bad day on this pitch, ended up across to groves-oilgy then had to traverse across around the small bulge.....i thought the gear below was crap http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24825 Richard Coulson 2009-09-18T15:32+00:00 it is easierb to nip across quickly rather than burn out placing gear higher up....but it will defo result in a ground fall!!!! http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24865 Keith Turner 2009-08-15T17:28+00:00 VERY green on the upper arête and probably a little undergraded, the crux certainly doesn't feel like a 4a! http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24803 twigulus 2008-11-14T16:52+00:00 the start is SUPER polished took me a while to get onto the first footholds :S http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24871 Steve Ramsden 2008-11-04T23:20+00:00 This is a good route, much better than it looks. However, I don't think that Ch-Ching is awaiting "the finish it really deserves". Because of the broken nature of the buttress, it makes... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24699 Simon Caldwell 2008-07-23T10:08+00:00 Much to my disappointment (I'd even donned my Aldi thrutching jacket in preparation) this turned out to involve minimal thrash technique, due to the plentiful supply of holds. Quite fun though. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=24895 David Warburton 2008-06-09T21:48+00:00 Well protected with a good rack of cams. Big holds.