In reply to Rob Exile Ward:
I was, formerly, a waste management professional in a niche area. Although none of this constitutes advice, I would consider the following points:
The UK environmental regulators can barely afford to pursue the industrial operators that fund them - prosecution is unlikely unless you *really* upset a third party,
The guidance and regulatory positions linked above are targeted at permitted operators. Again, you'd really have to upset a third party.
If your burner at home has a good air flow and is designed to achieve complete combustion (basically any non-range stove that could reasonably be called modern), then:
A) Metal based preservative compounds will mostly decompose and you'll have mass segregation of the metals into your retained ash. Don't dispose into the garden and the personal, public, and environmental risks are likely to be below negligible.
B) Modern stoves, if running good and hot, will allow near complete reaction of older organic preservatives and in most cases product compounds would be less environmentally detrimental than undiluted leachate the original preservative.
C) To be practically and legally 'hazardous', my understanding is that you would need a veeeery high concentration of older-school preservatives. To be acceptable, an industrial facility would optimise either through: running even hotter, burning smaller quantities among more benign waste (blending - depending on regulatory engage), or cleaning the off-gas (not viable).
If I decided, regardless of legal position, to get rid of this at home then my most risk-averse method would be:
- Run my stove good and hot on clean fuel,
- Add small loads of the recovered wood only (maybe when trying to get things really toasty),
- Make sure I have good air flow (a good draft would also negate any need to increase ventilation in the home,
- As a belt-and -braces safeguard, put any ash into the domestic waste - don't use in compost etc., and
- If I was being reeeeeeeeeally careful, do this on windy days to increase the dilution factor
If you ever use (non-smokeless) house coal or get rid of plastic at low-airflow you probably, per gram, cause more damage than this does.
Unless you're burning something that seeps preservatives (railway sleepers, some agricultural timbers) the regulator-accepted optimised process would likely be very similar.
I know there have been some downbeat stories about impacts of domestic burners but a hot, well oxygenated stove with some recombination and a good draw is actually pretty decent. A lot of those articles can be summarised as 'using stoves inappropriately achieves inappropriate outcomes'.